Same team, same operating model — more weeks buy more scope and scale, not a different foundation.
Two MVPs with the same idea can cost very differently. Here's what actually moves the number.
Before you spend on an MVP, know what investors will actually check under the hood — and how to walk in ready to pass.
You leave with a product you can keep building on, not a black box you have to rebuild.
The three fixed BeevR packages above are our productized pricing. For context, here is how the wider market prices an MVP in 2026 — and what moves your number inside it.
Across the industry, an MVP lands somewhere between $10,000 and $150,000, with most funded startups in the $30,000–$80,000 band. The spread is wide because "MVP" covers everything from a single-feature web app to a multi-tenant, compliance-bound platform. Roughly:
These are industry ranges, not a quote. Your number falls out of the drivers below.
Scope: how many real features. The fastest way to overspend is to build "v2" and call it an MVP. The point is to test the one thing investors or users won't take on faith. Every extra screen is real money; the discipline is deciding what to leave out. Web-only is cheaper than web plus native mobile, and a conventional design beats a bespoke one for an MVP.
Integrations. A login screen is cheap. A login screen wired into a payment gateway, an EHR via FHIR, or a factory's MES is not. The cost lives in the plumbing, error handling and reconciliation, not the button. Each external system you touch adds work.
Compliance. If you handle card or patient data, compliance shapes the architecture rather than bolting on later. Building HIPAA-readiness in adds about 15–25%; retrofitting it after launch can add 40–80% of the original build. That delta is the best argument for getting the foundation right the first time.
Team seniority. A senior team that gets the architecture right on the first pass is cheaper over the life of the project than a junior bench that ships something you rebuild before your round. Sticker rate is not total cost.
Hourly / time-and-materials. You pay for what you use. It's flexible, which sounds good until you realize the vendor carries none of the estimation risk. You do. Hours drift, scope creeps, the bill is open-ended. T&M suits long, evolving products with an in-house team to steer it; it's a poor fit for a fixed-runway founder who needs a known number before a round.
Fixed price per phase. Scope, timeline and cost are agreed up front. The vendor absorbs the estimation risk, which is why honest shops build a buffer into the quote: you're paying for certainty, a fair trade. You get a number you can budget and defend to investors. Fixed price only works when scope is defined, which is why we phase it: each phase is small enough to scope precisely, so you never sign a blank cheque for a vague twelve-month "platform".
Hiring in-house. Tempting once you've raised, but the math is brutal pre-revenue. A US full-stack engineer averages roughly $125K–$140K base in 2026, and the fully loaded cost (benefits, taxes, equipment, recruiting) runs about 1.25–1.6x that, so call it $180K+ per engineer per year. Add the months to hire and the risk your first two hires are the wrong two. To reach a fundable MVP, a senior studio on a fixed scope is faster and cheaper than building a team from scratch — even before you compare offshore software development rates by country.
Tell us your idea and we'll scope it into a fixed price and timeline in a free 30-minute call — no vague hourly estimates, no obligation.
Get a fixed quote